Search for Indicators
Disparities Dashboard
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
County: Washington
Community / Demographics
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington All-Age Birth Rate
County: Washington All-Age Birth Rate
58.9
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-44
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Value
(56.1)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
Prior Value
(64.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Foreign Born Persons
County: Washington Foreign Born Persons
5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Population Age 18 to 24
County: Washington Population Age 18 to 24
13,624
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(12,500)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Veteran Population
County: Washington Veteran Population
7.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Community / Public Safety
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions
11.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
(2014-2018)
The distribution is based on data from 21 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,266 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(9.0)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(11.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
County: Washington Traffic Stops
County: Washington Traffic Stops
9,804
Traffic Stop
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9,758)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Community / Transportation
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Households without a Vehicle
County: Washington Households without a Vehicle
7.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Mean Travel Time to Work
County: Washington Mean Travel Time to Work
29.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(32.0)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
County: Washington Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
County: Washington Workers who Bike to Work
County: Washington Workers who Bike to Work
0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
MD Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Workers who Drive Alone to Work
County: Washington Workers who Drive Alone to Work
76.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(68.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Workers who Walk to Work
County: Washington Workers who Walk to Work
1.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Economy / Housing & Homes
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Overcrowded Households
County: Washington Overcrowded Households
1.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
MD Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
County: Washington Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
45.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
County: Washington
Economy / Income
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Median Household Income
County: Washington Median Household Income
$73,017
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
($98,461)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Per Capita Income
County: Washington Per Capita Income
$36,528
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
($49,865)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Economy / Poverty
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: Washington Children Living Below Poverty Level
16.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Families Living Below Poverty Level
County: Washington Families Living Below Poverty Level
8.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
County: Washington People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
8.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)
County: Washington People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)
2,217
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington People Living Below Poverty Level
County: Washington People Living Below Poverty Level
12.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
County: Washington Young Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: Washington Young Children Living Below Poverty Level
17.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Youth not in School or Working
County: Washington Youth not in School or Working
1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Education / Educational Attainment
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington College Enrollment
County: Washington College Enrollment
19.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(22.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington People 18-24 by Educational Attainment
County: Washington People 18-24 by Educational Attainment
13,624
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(12,500)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington People 25+ by Educational Attainment
County: Washington People 25+ by Educational Attainment
108,430
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(108,974)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
County: Washington People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
23.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(42.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
County: Washington People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
88.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Veterans with a High School Diploma or Higher
County: Washington Veterans with a High School Diploma or Higher
92.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(95.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(95.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Access to Parks
County: Washington Access to Parks
0.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
MD Value
(73.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
Prior Value
(0.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washington
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults who Binge Drink
County: Washington Adults who Binge Drink
15.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
(2020)
The distribution is based on data from 21 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(15.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(17.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
64.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 23 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(39.9)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(55.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washington Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: Washington Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
63.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(43.1)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Washington
Health / Cancer
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
161.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(148.9)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(162.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(147.4)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the overall cancer death rate to 147.4 deaths per 100,000 population.</span></div>
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
41.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(33.5)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(41.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
County: Washington All Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washington All Cancer Incidence Rate
472.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(449.7)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(477.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washington Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
137.6
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(133.2)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(138.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Washington Cancer: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washington Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
38.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(35.2)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(37.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washington Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
67.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(51.8)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(67.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50+
County: Washington Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50+
17.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
(2018)
The distribution is based on data from 23 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
Prior Value
(77.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Washington Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
43.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(42.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washington Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
16.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(11.1)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washington Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
107.2
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(135.7)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(105.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults with Diabetes
County: Washington Adults with Diabetes
12.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 23 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(10.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults with Prediabetes
County: Washington Adults with Prediabetes
13.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
County: Washington Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Washington Diabetes: Medicare Population
30.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(30.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Disabilities
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Children with a Disability
County: Washington Children with a Disability
7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Washington Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with a Disability
County: Washington Persons with a Disability
15.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Washington Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Washington Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Washington Persons with a Vision Difficulty
2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Washington Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
8.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor
County: Washington Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor
9.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 21 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
County: Washington Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
84.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 20 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(88.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(88.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(88.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults with Health Insurance
County: Washington Adults with Health Insurance
89.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(91.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Children with Health Insurance
County: Washington Children with Health Insurance
92.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(95.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(94.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with Health Insurance
County: Washington Persons with Health Insurance
93.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(93.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
Prior Value
(93.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Washington Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
County: Washington Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
47.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(58.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(45.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
County: Washington Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
27.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(21.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Washington Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
3,219.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(2,547.0)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2,958.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Health Information Technology
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Washington Persons with an Internet Subscription
89.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(93.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
22.2
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
MD Value
(19.2)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
Prior Value
(26.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Washington Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Washington Heart Failure: Medicare Population
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington High Blood Pressure Prevalence
County: Washington High Blood Pressure Prevalence
38.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(32.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
County: Washington High Cholesterol Prevalence
County: Washington High Cholesterol Prevalence
36.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(24.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Washington Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
72.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Washington Hypertension: Medicare Population
71.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(68.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Washington Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Washington Stroke: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Washington Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
53.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(53.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
County: Washington Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
62.1%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(62.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Washington Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Babies with Low Birthweight
County: Washington Babies with Low Birthweight
10.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 23 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(8.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(8.0%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of births that are low weight to 8.0%.</span></div>
County: Washington Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
County: Washington Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
68.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(69.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(78.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(70.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(66.9%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to increase the proportion of pregnant women who receive prenatal care beginning in the first trimester to 66.9%.</span></div>
County: Washington Mothers who Received Late or No Prenatal Care
County: Washington Mothers who Received Late or No Prenatal Care
5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(6.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Preterm Births
County: Washington Preterm Births
10.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(10.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(11.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
County: Washington
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Mental Health
County: Washington Age-Adjusted ER Rate due to Mental Health
5,410.8
ER Visits per 100,000 population
(2017)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(4,291.5)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
Prior Value
(3,511.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(3,152.6)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the rate of emergency room visits due to mental health conditions to 3152.6 emergency room visits per 100,000 population.</span></div>
County: Washington Depression: Medicare Population
County: Washington Depression: Medicare Population
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Self-Reported Good Mental Health
County: Washington Self-Reported Good Mental Health
65.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
Prior Value
(74.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Mortality Data
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Life Expectancy
County: Washington Life Expectancy
75.1
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(78.0)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington
Health / Older Adults
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Disability
32.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(29.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
13.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
6.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Washington Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
12.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MD Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Washington Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Oral Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Washington Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
19.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
(2014)
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(11.0% in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults who Visited a Dentist
County: Washington Adults who Visited a Dentist
64.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(65.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(66.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(64.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults with No Tooth Extractions
County: Washington Adults with No Tooth Extractions
59.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(63.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(59.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(59.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Other Conditions
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Washington Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Washington Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
County: Washington Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
39.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Physical Activity
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
County: Washington Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
25.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(25.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults with Asthma
County: Washington Adults with Asthma
17.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 22 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(15.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Washington Asthma: Medicare Population
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington COPD: Medicare Population
County: Washington COPD: Medicare Population
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Chlamydia Incidence Rate
County: Washington Chlamydia Incidence Rate
425.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(506.7)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(469.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(431.0)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the chlamydia incidence rate to 431.0 cases per 100,000 population.</span></div>
County: Washington Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
County: Washington Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
154.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(181.1)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(215.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Syphilis Incidence Rate
County: Washington Syphilis Incidence Rate
4.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties.
MD Value
(12.7)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(17.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(24.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Tobacco Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults who Smoke
County: Washington Adults who Smoke
15.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(25.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Maryland SHIP 2017
(15.5%)
<div><span>The Maryland SHIP 2017 Target is to reduce the proportion of adults who currently smoke to 15.5%.</span></div>
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Washington
Health / Weight Status
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults Who Are Obese
County: Washington Adults Who Are Obese
38.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(34.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(38.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults who are Overweight or Obese
County: Washington Adults who are Overweight or Obese
74.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(67.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(68.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(24.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better
County: Washington Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better
84.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(86.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
US Value
(84.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(84.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Self-Reported Good Physical Health
County: Washington Self-Reported Good Physical Health
78.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
MD Counties
The distribution is based on data from 24 Maryland counties and county equivalents.
MD Value
(78.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Maryland State value.
Prior Value
(76.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
